User:Ms0615/Black River (North Carolina)/L.holmie Peer Review

1.These edits do a great job at providing a more in depth profile for the Black River. From the information about the ancient bald cypress trees found within regions near this river, to the details about recreation, your edits will make for a well-rounded article. These edits are really well done and, because of this, look like they are ready to go live. I was really impressed by the variety of information included in these edits.

2. Unless I missed something, your edits look really well done. My only current suggestion after this evaluation would be to move the Conservation up so that it is right beneath the Ancient bald cypress section since they relate to each other strongly. The Recreation section might do better above, or below these two sections instead of breaking them up. I think that this change would be an improvement, but whatever flows the best in your eyes is likely going to be just fine.

3. The most important edit I would suggest might be to insert the links (meaning to add the little numbers into the body of the text) to references 4 and 5 within the article like you did with 2 and 3. For example, at the very end of the conservation section, you could add the reference: [4] as this reference also includes information about the conservation status of the Black River. It is a minor edit that allows you to show how the information from multiple sources back up the statements being made within the edit.

4. I appreciate the variety of information included within these edits and will consider expanding on the topics discussed within my peer review to build a more well-rounded profile of the river I am working on in addition to beefing up our pollution section.