User:Mseelam/Hippodamia convergens/Samuelkades Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mseelam


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Mseelam/Hippodamia convergens - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Hippodamia convergens - Wikipedia

Lead
The lead is concise, however contains the important information about the species. It includes an introductory sentence that clearly and concisely describes the article's topic. It includes information about the habitat of the species. Not overly detailed.

Content
Content is generally relevant and up to date. However, there are some minor grammatical issues. Also, try to cite from the references in text so the reader can better understand what sources support what content. Content makes sense and appears to be relevant. I would add some more subsections about different aspects of the insect such as development, reproduction, etc to add information to your article!

Tone and Balance
All statements are neutral and informative. Article is not biased and does not try to change reader's viewpoint.

Sources and References
Add more in-text citations as claims are not directly supported by references. Sources used are diverse and fairly recent, however not all links work (bottom 4 references do not). Articles are peer-reviewed journals and primary literature so information is reliable. Focus on adding in-text citation and correcting reference format for bottom four references. The diversity of sources is good as well as the reliability of these sources.

Organization
Paper is fairly organized but short. Minimal grammatical errors, subsection division helps the article be organized. However, this article could benefit from more subsections in order to discuss more aspects of the insect and have the paper be more informative for the reader. The content currently written is concise and easy to read. Just focus on adding more subsections and double-checking minor grammatical issues. (commas, etc).

Images and Media
The sandbox draft does not contain any images or media. Adding some images would improve the quality of this article!

Overall Impressions
Overall, this article shows promising contribution. I would say keep adding subsection, images and media, and correcting source format! The more content and subsection/images you add will make this article great. The strengths of the content added include conciseness and ease to follow. However, information can be improved through adding more content, utilizing more subheadings, using in-text citations, adding images and media, as well as correcting citation format! Good luck!