User:Msheab/sandbox

Peer Review - Britney Haase
-         Lead: Since we have not published our works into the articles we are working on, the lead is not updated for the new information Maggie has added.

-         Content: The content seems to be relevant to the article being discussed. It does deal with women’s sexuality, which is highly underrepresented in history.

-         Tone and Balance: The tone is neutral, I do not feel persuaded to feel one thing.

-         Sources and References: There are no references included in the work.

-         Organization: At first it starts off organized, then it goes into sporadic bullet points. I believe the work is unfinished.

-         Images and Media: There are no images/media.

-         Overall Impression: I feel that this is a good start to an important topic. This has the potential to be a very good piece.

I have analyzed the information provided on a different page but have posted here for class sake.

Peer Review- Zoe
- Lead: We have not published our works, so this is not relevant yet.

- Content: This is a good start to adding to the article! Even if it is a small chunk, the material that is added about sexuality regarding women is good. As well, the list provided of topics to add in is a good way to organize thoughts.

- Tone & Balance: The tone is neutral which is great when writing an article, I feel like it is meant to educate rather than persuade.

- Sources & References: No sources are linked yet, just make sure to add those in!

- Organization: It is organized good for writing up a list of potential ideas, however, it was slightly confusing at first to read. Just add in more information.

- Images & Media: There are no images or media provided yet.

- Overall Impression: I think that this topic is incredibly interesting and there is a lot more information to provide to the article being edited. I would have liked to read more about your topic, so keep working! Great job so far.