User:Msiopy/Ratatouille the Musical/Meklite16 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Msiopy


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Msiopy/Ratatouille_the_Musical?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ratatouille the Musical

(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead- The lead makes is concise and makes sense. It would be good to add some more context on what the editor means by "zoom theatre" - I get it, but for someone else is not living in this time period (for people reading this in the future) it would be very confusing to understand.

Tone and Balance- The tone is very neutral, there is no bias.

Sources and Balances- The source added is cited correctly.

Organization- The added content is not directly stated as to what section it is going to be added to.

Overall impressions:

Overall,

The added content was not biased at all and it made sense. It would be good for this editor to add what section their work is going into and some context on the term "zoom theatre" which is stated in the lead.