User:Mtcav4/Punic people/SusJawn35 Peer Review

General info
Mtcav4
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mtcav4/Punic_people?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Punic people
 * Punic people

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:


 * The lead has been updated to reflect the new content added. It includes an introductory sentence that describes the article's topic.
 * The lead provides a brief description of the article's major sections.
 * It is concise and not overly detailed, which is appropriate for a lead section.

Content:


 * The content added is relevant to the topic of the Punic people.
 * It appears to be up-to-date.
 * There doesn't seem to be content missing or content that does not belong.
 * The article does not explicitly address Wikipedia's equity gaps or historically underrepresented populations or topics related to the Punic people.

Tone and Balance:


 * The content added appears neutral.
 * There are no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.
 * Different viewpoints are not overrepresented or underrepresented.
 * The content added does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.

Sources and References:


 * All new content is backed up by reliable secondary sources of information.
 * The content accurately reflects what the cited sources say.
 * The sources appear to be thorough, reflecting the available literature on the topic.
 * The sources are current and include a diverse spectrum of authors where possible.
 * The links in the article appear to work.