User:Mteakert/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1
===
 * Article title: King's College Chapel, Cambridge
 * Article Evaluation:
 * Lead section: Short and informative.
 * Content: Talks mostly about the construction of the chapel, briefly touches on the windows, rod screen, and current use, but mostly about the construction.
 * Sources/Links: Sources are reputable, and the links work.
 * Pictures: Has some pictures, I think more could be used to show the reader the chapel.
 * Overall impression: Not a bad article, just needs more.


 * Sources:
 * King's College Chapel, Cambridge ===

Option 2
===
 * Article title: Rose Window
 * Article Evaluation:
 * Lead section: General knowledge about rose windows.
 * Content: Actually contains a lot of knowledge about different types of rose windows and where they'd be used. As well as the history of rose windows, where you can find some examples, and the symbolism behind a rose window. There is also a timeline.
 * Sources/Links: Sources are strong, links work when you click on them.
 * Pictures: Has a lot of pictures which I enjoyed.
 * Overall impression: Good article, really strong, probably not the best to pick to edit because I don't know how much I'd be able to add.


 * Sources:
 * Rose window ===

Option 3
===
 * Article title: Urban planning in ancient Egypt
 * Article Evaluation:
 * Lead section: Gives some background on city planning.
 * Content: Goes through different time periods and talks about the city planning during those times.
 * Sources/Links: Lots of links, they all link to other wikipedia articles. Sources are reputable.
 * Pictures: One picture.
 * Overall impression: It's ok, interesting topic but not a lot of concrete information because it's still being debated.


 * Sources:
 * Urban planning in ancient Egypt ===

Option 4
===
 * Article title: Triforium
 * Article Evaluation:
 * Initially met with a message saying the article has multiple issues.
 * Lead section: Background on what a triforium is.
 * Content: Contains history but thats about it.
 * Sources/Links: "This article contains a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations."
 * Pictures: Gallery contains a lot of images.
 * Overall impression: Needs work, would like to work on this article.


 * Sources:
 * Triforium ===

Option 5
===
 * Article title: Clerestory
 * Article Evaluation:
 * Lead section: Contains background information of clerestories and where you'd find them in ancient times.
 * Content: Information about clerestories in different time periods. Modern clerestories for energy efficiency. Clerestories in transportation.
 * Sources/Links: Good sources, links work.
 * Pictures: Some pictures, not a lot, but enough.
 * Overall impression: Good article, but short. Want more information out of it.


 * Sources:
 * Clerestory ===