User:Mtsilva22/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Fast oil recovery

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I have a few friends that work at Pearl Harbor and work directly on ships, dealing with repairs and other sections of various ships. I think this topic matters because oil spills are becoming more highlighted in today's news due to an overall growing concern for ocean life and pollution. Before even opening the article and just seeing the title, I thought that it would be an in depth look at how oil spills can be addressed in a timely manner. That was not the case.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

I suppose the lead sentences is clear and concise but it extremely vague leading the reader to more questions. From the beginning you know that the article is barely that and requires more citations for verification; only citing 2 external links and 3 reference pictures. The article does come from a neutral point of view but overall, there's just not enough information at all. The information presented is extremely vague and there is almost nothing to aid the reader into what "Fast oil recovery" is or how exactly it is achieved. There are no discussions and only minimal revisions have been made. The image links are vague as well and don't aid the reader in visualizing what these "fast oil recovery systems" look like or how they work. Overall the article offers a vague description of what fast oil recovery is but lacks in detailed information and additional resources ti help the reader understand what exactly fast oil recovery is and how specifically it is beneficial to consumers and the environment.