User:Mujinga/Update-CM

And 4F

 * pension
 * political parties
 * tetraplegic
 * vanguardia

Format

 * Lead section
 * Plot / Synopsis
 * Cast
 * Themes
 * Production
 * Release
 * Critical response
 * Rotten Tomatoes / Top Critics
 * Audience response
 * Box office
 * Accolades
 * Home media
 * References
 * External links

Documentaries
Taken from Manual of Style/Film Documentary films require a modified approach for their articles. Instead of a plot summary, a documentary article should have a synopsis that serves as an overview of the documentary. The synopsis should describe the on-screen events of the film without interpretation, following the same guidelines that apply to a plot summary (see WP:FILMPLOT). Since a documentary deals with real-life topics and figures, provide wikilinks to them wherever useful. See the guidelines on link clarity and specificity, and link to terms that match the topic precisely if not closely. If coverage from secondary sources focuses on a specific aspect of the documentary, that aspect can be elaborated to provide context for the coverage. For example, the documentary may mention some statistics, and there is coverage from secondary sources analyzing these statistics, which are not detailed in the synopsis. An "Analysis" section can be written to detail the statistics from the documentary and to report the analytical coverage from secondary sources. Also, sometimes a documentary will be reviewed not just by film critics, but by authorities in the topic that the documentary covers; their reviews can be referenced. For topics that may be controversial, such as documentaries about politicized issues, please see the "Controversies" section.

Controversies
Taken from Manual of Style/Film For a controversial film, or a controversy stemming from a particular aspect of an otherwise uncontroversial film, editors should closely review Wikipedia's policy on editing from a neutral point of view. If there is contentious editing over a controversial topic, please follow Wikipedia's procedural policy of dispute resolution. Key applications of the NPOV policy include article structure and due weight. Content should not be split by the apparent POV. Policy says, "Try to achieve a more neutral text by folding debates into the narrative, rather than isolating them into sections that ignore or fight against each other." For example, a film that is based on historical events and has elicited contrary views may warrant a neutrally titled "Historical accuracy" section with sources that survey the filmmakers' intent or historians' differing assessments (positive or negative) of the film's historical accuracy. Due weight means: "Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint." Wikipedia aims to describe disputes, so controversial topics should already be covered by reliable, published sources. Policy states, "Discussion of isolated events, criticisms, or news reports about a subject may be verifiable and neutral, but still be disproportionate to their overall significance to the article topic." If a film is considered controversial as a whole, then that kind of coverage may make up a large portion of the article. In contrast, isolated criticisms may be briefly summarized. For example, complaints about a horror film's poster being too gory could be reported in passing in the article's "Release" section.

Identity

 * https://ciutatmorta.wordpress.com
 * https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3638598/
 * https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ciutat_morta

Academic

 * The attempted criminalisation of okupas was driven by a discourse of moral panic. On February 4, 2006, a policeman was injured by a flowerpot thrown off the rooftop of the squat Anarkopenya. This building was squat- ted in 2002 and its activity was limited to rave parties. Although the Barcelona City Council owned the building, they did not attempt to claim it back, surprising in a context of high eviction rates (GAC 2016). Processes of corruption and projects of state-led gentrification linked to the building were disclosed 10 years later by a journalistic investigation and a documen- tary film, Ciutat Morta. Debelle p61
 * Ciutat Morta/Dead City: Agency, ICTs and critical urban documentary in the Spanish context - https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781351006385/chapters/10.4324/9781351006385-7
 * An On-Screen Trial: Resistance to Corruption or Audience Manipulation in Ciutat Morta? = https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.14321/letrfeme.42.1.0101?seq=1
 * Subveillant narration, digital tools and videoactivism: Ciutat morta (2013) - https://academic.oup.com/screen/article-abstract/59/2/249/5036229
 * https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=V92nCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA266
 * https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Tn-bDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA129
 * https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=FYwFEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA417

Minor reviews

 * https://entitleblogdotorg3.wordpress.com/2014/12/08/barcelona-the-dead-city/
 * https://inkandcelluloid.wordpress.com/tag/gentrification/
 * https://freedomnews.org.uk/the-uncovering-of-the-barcelona-4-f-case/

Reliable reviews

 * 2014 https://www.elmundo.es/cataluna/2014/06/19/53a3170022601d4f558b4585.html
 * In 2014, El Mundo called it "a wonderful work". Xavier Artigas commented that "it's a documentary that comes out of rage" and said it was about a city "that thinks it is progressive but allows these things to happen"
 * Artigas won the Best National Feature Film Award in Documenta Madrid for his previous film [No-res] vida i mort d'un espai en tres actes
 * 2015 https://www.lavanguardia.com/local/barcelona/20150123/54424714752/ciutat-morta-historias-pelicula-4f.html
 * veyr useful, refs for fundraising, award etc
 * 2013 cinema squat - https://www.ccma.cat/324/ocupen-el-palau-del-cinema-de-via-laietana-per-projectar-el-documental-sobre-el-polemic-cas-4f/noticia/2133717/

Legacy
In 2017, El Pais noted that the release of Ciutat Morta and the resulting controversy had not led to the case being reopened or any of the convictions being overturned. However, it did also comment that the film had shone a spotlight on police violence and recalled that Ada Colau had organised her 2015 campaign to be mayor with a friend of Patricia Heras.
 * book https://www.traficantes.net/libros/ciutat-morta-cr%C3%B3nica-del-caso-4f
 * 2017 https://elpais.com/politica/2017/12/16/actualidad/1513445091_872789.html
 * 2019 https://www.lavanguardia.com/sucesos/20191126/471878000349/rodrigo-lanza-condena.html

Recent 2020 controversy

 * https://www.europapress.es/catalunya/noticia-ayuntamiento-rechaza-retirar-premi-ciutat-barcelona-documental-ciutat-morta-20201020142536.html
 * https://elpais.com/espana/catalunya/2020-09-25/pp-y-ciutadans-piden-la-retirada-del-premio-ciutat-de-barcelona-al-documental-ciutat-morta.html

To do

 * Infobox
 * Film image
 * Anarchist?
 * Italics title
 * Translated title
 * page for RL
 * reuse censorship articles
 * external links

Synopsis
345 words:

On the night of February 4, 2006, there was a rave in a squatted building in Sant Pere in Barcelona. When a Guàrdia Urbana (municipal police) patrol passed by, objects including flowerpots were thrown from the roof. A police officer not wearing a helmet was hit on the head, and grievously wounded. Three Latin American men holding Spanish passports (Alex Cisterna, Rodrigo Lanza and Juan Pinto)ancestry were immediately arrested on the street and allegedly mistreated at the police station. Later that night, two other young people, Patricia Heras and Alfredo Pestana, were cycling in the area and go to the hospital after a minor accident. A policeman present at the hospital to be with his colleague who had gone into a coma decided to arrest Heras and Alfredo, having profiled them as queer and punk. Heras always maintained that she had nothing to do with the incident. These events became the basis of the 4F ("February 4") case, in which the three men were convicted, Pestana was not charged and Heras committed suicide, having been received a sentence of three years imprisonment.

The documentary investigates whether those convicted were guilty of the offences and suggests that they were on trial more for their ancestry, the way the looked and their proximity to the events, not becuase they were the actual perpetrators. It focuses upon the poetry of Heras, read by an ex-partner, and interviews some of those convicted, including Rodrigo Lanza. It is noted that in 2011 two of the investigating policemen were convicted of torturing a young Latin American student who was the son of diplomat. In a fragment later cut from the film by order of the court before it was shown on Catalan television, it is alleged that a Guàrdia Urbana chief told falsehoods about what happened that night. Further, an anonymous witness claims that they could identify the person who actually threw the flowerpot from the rooftop. Broadening its theme, the film examines the political atmosphere of a gentrifying Barcelona, the "dead city" of the title, in which the streets are cleaned of people deemed undesirable by the city council.

What happened to
Three men: Rodrigo Lanza, +++


 * https://www.lavanguardia.com/local/barcelona/20150123/54424714752/ciutat-morta-historias-pelicula-4f.html - The injured policeman has never spoken publicly about the events. He was first in a coma and now is tetraplegic. Doctors are surprised that he survived the attack and he received the Police Merit Cross in 2013.


 * https://www.elnacional.cat/ca/societat/rodrigo-lanza-condemnat-20-anys-crim-tirants_540693_102.html - Rodrigo Lanza was imprisoned for five years after a barfight in 2017 with a man who was a member of the far-right party Falange Española de las JONS since the 1980s. The man was struck and fell over, later dying of his injuries. In 2020, Lanza's sentence was increased to 20 years.

Controversy
https://www.lavanguardia.com/local/barcelona/20150119/54423512102/fragmento-censurado-ciutat-morta-exito-visitas.html

In January 2015, the film was finally shown on Channel 33, with five minutes of footage removed by order of a Barcelona court. The footage did not pertain to the case itself but showed the head of the Information and Documentation department of the Guàrdia Urbana being admonished by a judge for telling falsehoods in another matter. The film implied the same man had also lied about the events on 4 February and thus had aided the prosecution case. The five minutes were still available online and within 24 hours had been viewed over 200,000 times.

Article links

 * https://www.verkami.com/projects/994-ciutat-morta-des_montaje-4f
 * http://www.lacriticanyc.com/ciudades-muertas-sistemas-deficientes/
 * http://poetadifunta.blogspot.com
 * https://cronicaglobal.elespanol.com dead
 * https://www.diagonalperiodico.net/culturas/22488-ciutat-morta-videoactivismo-rompe-silencio.html
 * https://web.archive.org/web/20150118234000/http://numerocero.es/cine/critica/ciutat-morta/2433
 * https://www.eldiario.es/interferencias/mantener-vida-poeta-muerta_132_4800665.html