User:Mullerybrux/Freshwater marsh/RMWilkens Peer Review

General info
Mullerybrux's draft of Freshwater marsh
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mullerybrux/Freshwater marsh
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Freshwater marsh

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: edits have not been published, but they look good!

Types: (I would change this header to be "Types of Freshwater Marshes" or "Types of Marshes")

This section is a very good addition. Continue building it and it will be a major improvement to the article!

Restoration:

I would personally expand this section to include conservation (maybe title it Conservation and Restoration). With this, you'd want to include reasons why people would want to restore or conserve existing marshes (I'm guessing to preserve biodiversity and the importance of these ecosystems in the world). If you choose to not add conservation, it is vital that you explain reasons why people would want to restore a marsh. This ties into functions and service, but the connections should be made explicit.

Functions and Service:

The content in this section is good, but I think it could be written more formally. This section would be stronger if specific examples of important animal and plant species are listed. With this, and with existing content in this section, it would be good to link to other wikipedia pages when a specific thing is mentioned (Taro, for example, would be a good link to add).

General:

Overall, you are making good edits to this article. Don't be afraid to re-write existing sections to improve the flow or formality. Overall, the article does not seem to be biased, in my opinion. I don't think it'll be much of an issue to be concerned with for most of the article, but I would be cautious of this when editing the restoration (/conservation?) section.

Your sources look good.