User:MusicMaker5376/RfA review

Welcome to the Question phase of RfA Review. We hope you'll take the time to respond to your questions in order to give us further understanding of what you think of the RfA process. Remember, there are no right or wrong answers here. Also, feel free to answer as many questions as you like. Don't feel you have to tackle everything if you don't want to.

In a departure from the normal support and oppose responses, this review will focus on your thoughts, opinions and concerns. Where possible, you are encouraged to provide examples, references, diffs and so on in order to support your viewpoint. Please note that at this point we are not asking you to recommend possible remedies or solutions for any problems you describe, as that will come later in the review.

If you prefer, you can submit your responses anonymously by emailing them to gazimoff (at) o2.co.uk. Anonymous responses will be posted as subpages and linked to from the responses section, but will have the contributor's details removed. If you have any questions, please use the talk page.

Once you've provided your responses, please encourage other editors to take part in the review. More responses will improve the quality of research, as well as increasing the likelihood of producing meaningful results.

Once again, thank you for taking part!

Questions
When thinking about the adminship process, what are your thoughts and opinions about the following areas:


 * 1) Candidate selection (inviting someone to stand as a candidate)
 * Seems to work just fine. I think people willing to be nominated should have a way of letting others know.
 * 1) Administrator coaching (either formally or informally)
 * Logical. Works well.
 * 1) Nomination, co-nomination and self-nomination (introducing the candidate)
 * I think self-nominations should be abolished. If one would make a good admin, others will notice.
 * 1) Advertising and canvassing
 * Should be banned. No harm in letting a few Wikifriends know, but when it's over 10 or so, it starts to get out of hand.
 * 1) Debate (Presenting questions to the candidate)
 * Questions are a good idea: they let people unfamiliar with the candidate get a feel for how well they communicate. I think opposing because a candidate failed to answer a few questions is stupid.
 * 1) Election (including providing reasons for support/oppose)
 * I think the process works well, but I think neutral votes should be abolished. If you're neutral you should just keep your mouth shut.
 * 1) Withdrawal (the candidate withdrawing from the process)
 * I can't imagine a reason to not allow this to happen.
 * 1) Declaration (the bureaucrat closing the application. Also includes WP:NOTNOW closes)
 * 2) Training (use of New Admin School, other post-election training)
 * 3) Recall (the Administrators Open to Recall process)
 * I think all admins should be subject to recall. There are administrators hanging around from the early days of WP who were passed with the support of fewer than ten editors; I hardly think that reflects the current feelings of the community.  I don't think singling out individuals is the best option -- anyone with a beef against an admin....
 * 1) Recall (the Administrators Open to Recall process)
 * I think all admins should be subject to recall. There are administrators hanging around from the early days of WP who were passed with the support of fewer than ten editors; I hardly think that reflects the current feelings of the community.  I don't think singling out individuals is the best option -- anyone with a beef against an admin....

When thinking about adminship in general, what are your thoughts and opinions about the following areas:


 * 1) How do you view the role of an administrator?
 * 2) What attributes do you feel an administrator should possess?
 * 1) What attributes do you feel an administrator should possess?

Finally, when thinking about Requests for Adminship:


 * 1) Have you ever voted in a request for Adminship? If so what was your experience?
 * 2) Have you ever stood as a candidate under the Request for Adminship process? If so what was your experience?
 * 3) Do you have any further thoughts or opinions on the Request for Adminship process?
 * 1) Do you have any further thoughts or opinions on the Request for Adminship process?
 * 1) Do you have any further thoughts or opinions on the Request for Adminship process?

Once you're finished...
Thank you again for taking part in this review of the Request for Adminship process. Now that you've completed the questionnaire, don't forget to add the following line of code to the bottom of the Response page by clicking this link and copying the following to the BOTTOM of the list.

*   added by  at

Again, on behalf of the project, thank you for your participation.

This question page was generated by RFAReview at 15:20 on 20 June 2008.