User:MusicManDan123/Audiotree/J0cote12 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

MusicManDan123


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:MusicManDan123/Audiotree


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Audiotree

Evaluate the drafted changes
Regarding the lead I think it provides a good introduction and summary of what the article discuses. However, I would probably add the name of the founders in the lead. Overall the lead is concise.

The content is relevant to the topic and up to date. I particularly liked the “Recording/Broadcasting Process” section I thought it was very informative and detailed. I don’t think the article deals with one of Wikipedia’s equity gap but it is definitely adding information that is not on Wikipedia.

Overall, the content is neutral and unbiased. All viewpoints are balanced.

Some of the sources are not secondary sources however I can imagine that in this case it is very hard to find secondary sources and it might not be possible at all. The content does reflect the cited source’s content. I do think the sources are thorough because as I said I think there is a shortage of information on the subject. Yes, the sources are current and the links work. The content is well-written and organized.

Overall: The content added significantly improves the quality of the article, you did a very good job. The only thing I can think of to improve the article is maybe add an image.