User:Muzhogg/Archive 1

WP:BRD
You boldly removed the link. I reverted your action. So I think the onus is on you to make your case, and to make it in accordance with our policies and guidelines, not your addenda to our policies and guidelines. It takes some nerve to say "this should not happen until this issue is resolved", when you're the one who is taking issue with things. If you want to edit-war, that's your choice. But don't pretend that you're "waiting until the issue is resolved". Guettarda (talk) 02:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Those interested can see my response on the article talk page - Talk:Evolutionary_argument_against_naturalism Muzhogg (talk) 03:25, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Err...I'm quite interested. When are you planning to post this reply?  Guettarda (talk) 03:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * That's curious. I thought I had, but I must have exited without saving! I'll get around to rewriting it when time allows. Apologies for the oversight. Muzhogg (talk) 05:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

There's a pattern
By way of reminder to myself if I need it in future;

I stuffed up on this one. I majorly misread another editors contribution and so I offered this apology;

And a couple of hours later I got this in response from a guy who was obviously still hot under the collar;

What in there says that EAAN is an argument against evolution. How do you get there? And not only did you accuse me of saying things I had not said - you felt the need to italicise and bold the statement I didn't make. You felt the need to demand that I provide sources for something I had not said. There's "nothing personal" when you make stuff up, and then use that stuff you made up in order to attack a person? Now, mind you, if it had been your first unwarranted attack, I might have brushed it off. But there's been a pattern of attacks from you. One, it's easy enough to brush off. Two, it's a stretch, but I'm willing to take it at face value. But now a third attack, in which you made all sorts of false accusations of misbehaviour against me, in which you resort to just making crap up and yelling about it.

Making crap up about people is unacceptable. Making false accusations is unacceptable. I have no idea what it is you have against me, but either deal with it in the appropriate forum, or get over it. Guettarda (talk) 05:34, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

I'll only add that I offered an apology on both the editors talk-page AND on the article talk-page, so I'm left wondering as to what IS the proper forum? My guess is that this is one of those best left without oxygen.

--Muzhogg (talk) 07:16, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Funny
I point out that your claim that there was "nothing personal" in your last set of attacks, given your past behaviour. And your response - to launch into a fresh set of false attacks. Seriously, if you have a problem with me, don't use an article talk page to "settle scores", or whatever it is you believe you are doing. Please stick to the facts. Please stop making up falsehoods. Thank you. Guettarda (talk) 14:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC)