User:Mvill6/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Little Red Riding Hood (1997 film)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
My professor told me to.

Evaluate the article
1: Lead section


 * The introductory sentence does concisely and clearly describe the topic of the article
 * The lead doesn't really lead into the following sections or describe them, there is the box with the shortcuts to them though.
 * The lead doesn't include anything that shouldn't be there.
 * The lead is pretty concise

2: Content


 * The content is relevent and seems to be up to date, All of the content seems to fit, there may be some small things missing, but not much, and it does not have to deal with any equity gaps.

3: Tone and Balance


 * There seems to be a claim at the end of the plot rather than staying neutral to any argument, so there is a side of an argument represented without the other half, so this isn't truly neutral

4: Sources and References


 * All of the facts seem to be backed up be a secondary source and those sources appear to be thorough and up to date, the sources come from a variety of authors and all of the links work

5: Organization and writing quality


 * It is pretty easy to read, there is a missing word in one of the sentences, and the sections are in order and everything

6: Images and Media


 * the only image on the page is the movie poster for the film, which is captioned and adheres to copyright policy

7: Talk page Discussion


 * the talk page has many suggestions on what should be added and the corrections that should be made, it is a part of WikiProject Film and has been rated Start-Class

8: Overall Impressions


 * The staus of this article is a work in progress, any argumentative points should be removed and a neutral tone should be held throughout, the strength of the article is that it has a clear lead and a good organization, the article is pretty good but needs some more development.