User:Mvtrinh/Great purple hairstreak/Oluchiao Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mvtrinh


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mvtrinh/Great_purple_hairstreak?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Great purple hairstreak

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead was updated to reflect new content being added. The lead has an introductory sentence that describes the articles topic. The lead doesn't not have a description of the articles main sections. The lead is nice and concise.

Content

The content added is relevant to the topic and is up to date. They added information about their morphology, distribution and life cycle. The article fills in knowledge gaps.

Tone and Balance

The content that was added was neutral and doesn't seem to be biased in any way.

Sources and References

There are a variety of sources used in the article and they look very diverse. Only two of the sources have the same author. The links of the sources work.

Organization

The content is well-written and is well-organized. I did t notice any grammatical or spelling errors in the content. The content was broken off into a few sections and I think that way of organizing the information was good.

Images and Media

There are no images in the draft.

Overall impressions

Overall, I think they did a really good job in drafting their article. I think the content added improved the overall quality of the article significantly. I think the only way it can be improved is by adding more information.