User:Mvtrinh/Great purple hairstreak/TheChurroGuy Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mvtrinh


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mvtrinh/Great_purple_hairstreak?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Great purple hairstreak

Lead
The lead has been updated to reflect the new content added with a clear introductory sentence and does give a brief description of the article's major sections. Compared to the current version, this article contains less historical context and more scientific descriptions of the species given that a life cycle section was added but the history content was removed.

Content
The added content is more relevant to the topic than was the information removed, and the content is up-to-date. There seems to be a section on reproduction that has nothing under it, so that section does seem to be missing. This article does not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balance
The content added is neutral given it is scientific observations on the development of the organism. There are not any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position, nor any viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented. Since the information focuses heavily on scientific aspects of the species, perhaps a portion of the article could describe how humans impact the species or any interactions they may have with their ecological environment.

Sources and References
All new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information. The content that could be validified accurately reflect what the cited sources say, but some references are behind a paywall that make it difficult to access. The most recently added sources are current, and sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors including an article written in Spanish, so they include historically marginalized individuals which makes sense given the species is largely found in Mexico. Sources are largely scientific articles from journals, so articles are already peer-reviewed, and the links to them work.

Organization
The content added is well-written and well-organized with a chronological flow in life cycle while free of grammatical and spelling errors.

Images and Media
There are no images in the article although there are images in the current version of the article, so that can be an improvement to be made.

Overall Impressions
The article is indeed more complete. The content added describes the organism as it develops, lending a more scientific tone to the article. To improve, images/media could be added, and perhaps a portion could describe the human impact on the species.