User:Mw011235

Notes on editing Wikipedia pages
I've encountered some differences from my own vocabulary or usage that may be attributable to differences in standard English style in other countries. I assume I should not be changing these sort of differences to my own country's standard style. Mw011235 (talk) 00:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Consultant
No inline citations to support statements. Seems written without obvious bias. URLs in reference list work but are not linked to the article as citations.

Survey sampling
Could use some further drafting to improve paragraph structure. There are a good number of inline citations, but more are needed. The OMB link is temporarily broken as part of the White House transition process. (I added note to talk page.) The AAPOR link is broken. (I fixed it.)

Heteroscedasticity
Reads pretty well and generally has good paragraph structure. The illustrations are helpful, but are a bit small to see clearly. There are a good number of inline citations, but some sections have none. The further reading list and external links are all about econometrics, so perhaps a bit of bias here.

Linear regression
The section structure makes sense. The article is fairly long. There are numerous inline citations, but many paragraphs have none.