User:MxManatee123/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Carbon fixation

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This was a C-rated ecology article. I chose it because carbon fixation is a major component of photosynthesis and understanding that process can be helpful for people looking into understanding climate change, CO2 levels, and how to alleviate the issues.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The net vs. gross section is confusing. It doesn't talk about net vs. gross at all. It basically sounded like an overview and the picture didn't correspond with the text. This appeared to attempt to be a lead section but was lacking information. This section needs to be reworded and add more information. The article overall seemed to make the concept more confusing than it really is. I think a lot needs to be reworded and maybe restructured for a better flow. The article seemed to be neutral and just presented the facts and didn't seem to be connected with any particular position. The links work and seem to match up with the information shared. The sources are primarily peer-reviewed research articles from reliable publications. The wikitalks section noted my same confusion about the net vs. gross section and noted some confusion with wording. This article is a part of 3 wikiprojects: WikiProject Molecular Biology/Molecular and Cell Biology, Ecology and Geology. I think this is a really important page that needs to be redone so that the information is clear and simple.