User:Mxf315/Obstacles to receiving mental health services among African American youth/Hundredjshpt Peer Review

General info
User: Mxf315
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mxf315/Obstacles to receiving mental health services among African American youth/Bibliography
 * User:Mxf315/Obstacles to receiving mental health services among African American youth
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Obstacles to receiving mental health services among African American youth

Evaluate the drafted changes
Peer review Lead


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

Yes, the Lead has been revised to include the fresh information that the peer contributed. The Lead's overall quality has increased as a result of the peer's contribution of knowledge regarding the significance of culturally competent mental health treatment.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

Yes, the lead contains a succinct and straightforward introductory statement that sums up the subject of the piece. The emphasis of the essay is made evident by the opening statement, "This article explores the obstacles faced by African American youth in accessing mental health services."


 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

Absolutely, an overview of the article's main sections can be found in the Lead. The article's key arguments are described in the sentence "The article discusses the prevalence of mental health issues among African American youth, the barriers to accessing services, and the importance of culturally competent care."


 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?

No, information contained in the article is not included in the Lead. The Lead does not present any new or unnecessary information; instead, it accurately summarizes the article's substance.


 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

The Lead is succinct and spares the reader from needless material. It is succinct and to the point, summarizing the article's main ideas without going into too much detail.

Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?

The Lead is concise and spares the reader from needless material. It is succinct and to the point, summarizing the article's main ideas without going into too much detail.


 * Is the content added up-to-date?

Citations from recent studies are included in the article, suggesting that the writers have read the most recent findings on this subject. The data in the article is current and accurately represents our current understanding of the problem.


 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

The article is simple to read and well-written. The writers give a brief and understandable summary of the barriers African American kids have while trying to get mental health care. They also talk about potential fixes for these problems. The writing is coherent, and the writers back up their assertions with pertinent examples.


 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

One of the equity gaps on Wikipedia is addressed in the article. Although African American kids experience a disproportionate number of mental health problems, they are less likely to get the help they require. This problem is brought to light in the article along with the contributing causes. The paper discusses issues pertaining to a historically marginalized group of people. In terms of mental health care, African American adolescents have historically received less attention. The article explores potential answers while bringing attention to the difficulties this group encounters.

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral?

The article's material is largely impartial and objective. The writers don't overtly try to sway the reader's opinion in favor of or against another position. Nonetheless, there are a few places when the writers employ terminology that can be seen as prejudiced. For instance, the authors declare that "African American youth are disproportionately affected by mental health problems" yet don't give any background information or justification for their claim.


 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

There are no claims in the article that seem overtly prejudiced in favor of one side or the other. There are a few places, though, where the writers could have backed up their assertions with more data. The authors write, for instance, that "youth of African American descent are more likely to encounter stigma related to mental health issues." Although the writers do not offer any concrete examples to back up this assertion, it is nonetheless a valid one.


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

The essay does a fantastic job of presenting a range of perspectives on the subject of African American youth's access to mental health care. The research is cited by the writers from a range of sources, including as scholarly publications, official documents, and neighborhood associations. This makes it easier to make sure the article offers a thorough and impartial analysis of the problem.


 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

The purpose of the article is not to sway the reader's opinion in favor of or against another. The writers only lay out the information and let the reader make their own judgments. This is a suitable method for this kind of article.

Sources and references


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

Yes, a trustworthy secondary source of information supports every new piece of content in the article. To bolster their arguments, the writers reference a wide range of government papers, book chapters, and peer-reviewed studies.


 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)

Yes, what is said in the cited sources is accurately reflected in the text. The authors do not alter or falsify the facts; instead, they provide a thorough summary of the conclusions drawn from the sources they quote.


 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

Yes, the sources are comprehensive and accurately represent the body of knowledge on the subject. Numerous sources from various fields, such as psychology, sociology, public health, and education, are cited by the writers.


 * Are the sources current?

Yes, the sources are comprehensive and accurately represent the body of knowledge on the subject. Numerous sources from various fields, such as psychology, sociology, public health, and education, are cited by the writers.


 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?

Indeed, a wide range of writers, including academics who identify as Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), have contributed to the sources. The writers also try to include quotes from previously underrepresented authors.


 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)

No, the sources mentioned by the writers are the best ones available. The writers have chosen reliable, current, and pertinent sources with care.


 * Check a few links. Do they work?

The article's links do indeed function. All of the sources that the writers mentioned were available to me.

Organization


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

The piece is easy to read and well-written. The writers clarify the complex problem of African American youth's barriers to mental health care in simple and straightforward terms.


 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

There were no spelling or grammar mistakes that I could discover in the article.


 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

The essay is divided into sections that accurately represent the main ideas of the subject and is well-organized. The writers start out by talking about how common mental health issues are among young African Americans, and then they list and address the different barriers that these young people have when trying to get mental health care. The essay ends with a call to action, imploring legislators and medical professionals to act in order to remove these barriers and enhance African American youths' access to mental health care.

Images and media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?

There is no pictures in the article that can help to understand more the topic.


 * Are images well-captioned?

There is no images in the article so we can't answer to this question.


 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?

There is no images in the article so we don't have to worry about the copyright regulations


 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

No images at all.

Overall impressions


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?

The article's overall quality has been enhanced by the additional content, which offers a more thorough and nuanced understanding of the barriers African American kids encounter when trying to get mental health care. The writers have skillfully included fresh data and viewpoints, producing an essay that is both more comprehensive and educational.


 * What are the strengths of the content added?

The article's thesis is strengthened and the topic is given more specificity with the inclusion of facts and data on the incidence of mental health problems among African American kids. The research is deepened and made more informative by the thoughtful exploration of historical and cultural impediments to mental health care for African Americans. Personal tales and case studies are used to help readers understand the issue and show how these barriers affect people in the real world.


 * How can the content added be improved?

A more in-depth examination of how institutional racism and implicit bias contribute to these barriers will improve the piece. The authors may want to think about providing more detailed suggestions for removing the noted obstacles and enhancing African American youths' access to mental health services. The paper would be strengthened overall with a more thorough conclusion that underlines the importance of additional study and action while summarizing the main results.