User:Mxg2030/Zhenotdel/Jcw379 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mxg 2030


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mxg2030/Zhenotdel?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Zhenotdel

'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?'''

All information in the sandbox is useful and supplements the original page. The only thing that distracted me is the tone and wording not being the most informative, but this is expected as a draft.

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?'''

The article is neutral, but there are certain claims that could be better worded (for example limiting the use of “wanted”) in a better way. In addition, these statements still need citations.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

The perspective of the Zhenotdel and Party groups are equally represented as far as I can tell.

'''Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''

References are not included in the sandbox, and there are no citations.

'''Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''

As stated earlier, the statements regarding the aspirations and intentions of Kollontai are not cited or backed by evidence. Additionally, I am unsure if there are sources clearly and reliably stating these figures “wanted” to do certain things outright.

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?'''

N/A, there are no sources in either the main page or the bibliography sandbox.

Besides basic changes to tone and wording, as well as needing to add sources and citations, the information seems to fit well with the Wiki page.