User:Mxmansa/Acid–base titration/JustAnotherInternetUser Peer Review

General info
Mxmansa and Sshoore
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Mxmansa/Acid–base titration
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Acid–base titration

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article had an existing introduction section that had/needed little editing which had a good overview of the topic, though citations should be added to the introduction. It had clearly organized sections with clearly communicated information. There was lots added to the acidimetry and alkalimetry section, along with an image, though I don't think I added much to the topic of discussion. The indicator section had a lot of addictions with a table of common indicators which I think was a good addition. The figure added for the graphical sections were a good addition, but maybe see if the formatting could be fixed. They sort of overlap with other sections and look unorganized. The first reference is just a Wikipedia page on Neutralization chemistry, which was an already hyperlinked a little bit before being cited in the paragraph. I also don't think you're supposed to cite another wiki page like that. Overall, the informations was organized, easy to follow and understand, and was straight to the point in what it was trying to communicate.