User:Mxmansa/Acid–base titration/Rmchar Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Mxmansa, Sshoore
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mxmansa/Acid–base titration:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Acid–base titration:
 * Acid–base titration:

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

The lead has effectively been updated for conciseness and reflects the content of the article. Some of the changes contain indirect nouns which may be a point of confusion. As well, they might want to add brief description about the monoprotic, diprotic and polyportic acids which they added to a later section in the article.

Content:

Content added is relevant and current to the topic. I liked how they added a table summarizing the types of indicator instead of typing that information out. One potential thing to add is how to identify the equivalence point when given a titration curve and how the changes with polyprotic acids. Also, I like the section added talking more about phenolphthalein but the group could potentially add information about other popular indicators or when phenolphthalein is not suitable. Other than that the new edits are really well done and enhance the current article significantly.

Tone and Balance:

All the new content is very neutral and does not frame the information in any sort of biased way.

Sources and References:

Missing a few citations, for example:

- " Its sharp and easily detectable colour changes makes phenolphthalein a valuable tool for determining the endpoint of acid-base titrations, as a precise pH change signifies the completion of the reaction."

All references are accurate and up to date.

Organization

Organization of the article is well done, the addition of the tabulated data helps with clarity. The addition of figures also helps reduce some unclear sections from the original article.

Images

The addition of the graphs showing the ph vs volume of titrant added are very effective in enhancing the text. However, for the image captioned "titration of a standard solution", it is unclear if this is adding anything useful to the article. Perhaps instead a more detailed labelled experimental setup could be more beneficial.