User:MyBloodIsMadeOfCoffee/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Myosatellite cell

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This cell type is the basis for culturing meat, but there is no reference to this at all on the page. With how important this new topic (cultured meat) is growing, it seems pertinent that there should be more info provided on the page. It also seems that most information on the page is outdated and so lacks current insights into the topic.

Evaluate the article
Lead section- The lead section provides a good overview of the subject and introduces what Myosatellite cells are, but the second paragraph goes into detail on what they look like and where they are located, which I feel would benefit from being in a the 'structure' section and potentially a 'location' section. It is a slightly overwhelming amount of detail for an 'intro'/lead section.

Content- Most of the content on the page is older and there have not been any major revisions for over 5 years, the latest major change was the addition of a cell activation and muscle regeneration section. The 'structure' section is lacking any information on the actual structure of the cells and instead talks about their genetics. The 'muscle repair' and 'muscle regeneration' sections are the same thing.

Tone and Balance- the article as a whole does a good job of remaining neutral in tone, and providing all sides of the topic, though there are not explicitly 'sides' when it comes to talking about cells. For example, none of the sections claim that Myosatellite cells are the greatest cell in the body.

Sources/References- The most recent source is from 2015, so it may be a good idea to go through and update sources and information throughout the article with more recent sources.

Organization/Quality- The article overall is decent with the only major organizational problem being the repeated 'muscle repair' and 'muscle regeneration' sections. A section of the actual structure of the cells would be welcomed as well, the current 'structure' section just mentions the genetics of the cells. I found no grammar or spelling errors while reading but a more thorough check wouldn't be bad.

Images/Media- There is only one image on this page and it came from a free access article. An image of Myosatellite cells on the top of the page would be extremely helpful for people who are just taking a glance at the page and more detailed photos involving the cellular processes would be good in sections involving those.

Talk Page- The page is part of both molecular biology and anatomy wiki-projects, but has been designated as low importance and C-class in content assessment. There was an unsigned comment about how the name of the page was bad but other than that the talk page is extremely sparse with only 5 total 'talks' with one of them being a bot that corrected a citation.

Overall- I think the article is decent in terms of the content that it presents but I think it needs some help with the organization of the article and it needs a major update to all of the sources used to more present information. It may also be pertinent to change the page to one called just 'Satellite Cells' as most sources call them that and only a select few call the cells 'Myosatellite Cells'.