User:MyNameIsPixul/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Anti-Defamation League

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because the given topic involves rather inflammatory information that could result in an improper tone if handled poorly. The topic also involves more recent events (e.g. rising antisemitism in America, Elon Musk's ironic threats to sue the League for defamation, etc.), so this evaluation should also check if it's been updated recently.

Lead Section
The first sentence of the article clearly explains what the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is and what they do. The rest of the lead is similarly concise, briefly explaining its founding, office locations, and some campaigns of the League. The lead gives readers the most important information regarding the ADL quite well, and in a fairly succinct four paragraphs.

Content
All of the content in the article is accurate, informative, has several references to trusted and relevant sources, and is placed in the sections appropriate for its nature. It has also been updated recently; events that occurred just days ago (for reference, the date is 9/8/2023) have been added to the article.

Tone and Balance
The tone is neutral and balanced as expected, and is preserved through especially opinionated sections, such as "Reception", which details criticisms from both the right and left without straying from neutrality.

Sources and References
The article is incredibly well-sourced, having an astonishing 181 separate sources, with some being referenced multiple times. References are extremely prevalent; it is rare to go through a few sentences without stumbling across at least one. They are always brought up when relevant to the current part of the article. A decent amount of the sources come from the League itself, but the majority are from trusted websites that are either informative in nature or reporting on current events relevant to the article at that point.

Organization and Writing Quality
Information is presented in an organized way consistent with other Wikipedia articles of a similar layout. Headings are split into "History", "Political positions", "Relations with religious and ethnic groups", and "Reception" in that order. Subheadings divide these topics appropriately; for example, in "History", earlier decades are grouped together to make for easier reading, while later decades are split by decade for consistency.

Images and Media
The only piece of media on the page (excluding the series box) is the ADL's logo. This is likely because there isn't much media that is relevant to the contents of the article, but there should be at least one other piece of media. The ADL has some pictures of their work uploaded to their site, https://atlanta.adl.org/; maybe an image from there could be used.

Overall
The Wikipedia article regarding the ADL is well-researched, well-written, and completely neutral. The only criticism I have is that there is nothing except the ADL's logo for media on the page.