User:Myer7692/Evaluate an Article

Topic: Mike Breen

Lead Section:

The lead omits important information that would inform the reader of the major sections of the article. The introductory sentence is not very detailed, but it does tell what Michael Breen's current job title is.

Content:

There is content that is missing in this article. It doesn't address his early career and personal life very much at all. It also doesn't say a lot about Mike Breen's recent Hall of Fame Induction that took place in 2021.

Tone and Balance:

This is an informational article about Mike Breen, so it is neutral. It does tend to present him as one of the top broadcasters in his field, by pointing out all of his accolades, but that is a fair assessment considering the success that he has had throughout his career.

Sources and References:

There isn't as much information as there should be about Mike Breen, so there are only six reference links, but those do seem to be fairly accurate.

Organization and Writing Quality:

I found the writing to be fairly bland. It could be presented in a more interesting way, with more voice, but that being said, I did not find any spelling or grammatical errors.

Images and Media:

There are no images at all, which makes this an article that would not catch people's attention or make them want to read it.

Talk Page Discussion:

This article is rated start class, and it is only a part of three wiki projects.

Overall Impressions:

Although the information was present for the most part, this article has many areas that could be improved. It is not aesthetically pleasing to the eyes, and the lead sentence does not capture the reader's attention.