User:Mz7/Nuclear option

The arbitration policy is the document which establishes the English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee and delineates its roles and responsibilities. The policy allows the community to amend the policy by following a two-step procedure.

Ordinarily, community consensus cannot overrule the Arbitration Committee's decisions—see WP:CONEXCEPT. However, in an extraordinary scenario in which the community has completely lost confidence in the current Arbitration Committee, it has the ability to use the arbitration policy's amendment procedure to overrule the Arbitration Committee on an extraordinary basis. This could be thought of as the community's nuclear option, a reference to an extraordinary procedure in the U.S. Senate that allows a simple majority to overcome the usual supermajority threshold needed to avoid a filibuster.

This is quite the bureaucratic process, but it is currently the only procedure within policy that allows the community to overrule specific arbitration decisions outside of (1) asking the Committee to overrule their own decision, and (2) annual elections (i.e. voting for or running as candidates that promise to overrule certain decisions). Historically, an appeal to Jimbo Wales existed an option, but this was removed in May 2023.

Examples
To invoke the procedure, an editor will need to start two consecutive requests for comments (RfCs):
 * 1) Petition phase: a petition to amend the arbitration policy must first be signed by 100 editors in good standing (see here for an example).
 * 2) Referendum phase: if the petition is signed by 100 editors, then the amendment will "undergo formal ratification through a community referendum and will enter into force once it receives majority support, with at least one hundred editors voting in favour of adopting it" (see here for an example).

Dissolving the Arbitration Committee
See also WP:ACERFC2019.