User:Mzimet/Disordered eating/Isabelle.Rose13 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Mzimet


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mzimet/Disordered_eating?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Disordered eating

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead/Content

The content is great! It's informative, organized, and very well spoken. There was not a noticeable lead section, but I think a small paragraph introducing what is already written would be an easy fix. The content is very much so relevant to the topic flows well. I think it was very inclusive and balanced.

Sources

All of the information is up to date with sources ranging from 2016-2022. The sources are all reliable and scholarly. I believe some more in-text citations could be added, purely because I remember the trainings saying that almost every sentence should have a citation.

Organization/Images

It is organized and is structured well. I didn't notice any grammatical or spelling errors. No images were added, but I think they would have a good effect on this piece of writing. It would add to how well written and structured it is. Overall, I think you did a good job! I believe just adding a Lead section to introduce your other sections of the article and maybe adding an image would have a positive impact.

Peer Review Response
Hi there Isabelle! Thank you so much for your feedback and kind words. I do think I need to included more inn-text citation. I think sometimes I worry If I have them to constantly back to back but you are right technically that is very typical of writing fact-based information. I will definitely make an effort to go back and included these in-text citation corrections.