User:Mzimet/Disordered eating/Sbradford1149 Peer Review

Overall, the Lead reflects the new content added by the peer in a general census. I do think there is a lot of background information about the topic and there could be something added to the Lead that makes it more specific to the information provided. The content added is relevant to the topic and can be considered up-to-date. I do think there could be more information added about what these disorders actually involve. It gives a clear view of the psychology and concepts behind these disorders, however could add more content on what distinguishes differences between them and the tendencies people with this disorder commonly have. The overall tone is neutral and organized clearly. The sources presented are an adequate amount and of credible quality. They are also cited in-text properly throughout the article. In conclusion, the content added builds upon the topic and presents significant quality to the topic.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)