User:N8mitchell/sandbox

Content
All three articles have useful information, graphics, and data relevant to my topic. In all the articles, the citations got distracting. It would be mid-sentence, and there would be a giant gap filled with a citation until the sentence picked up again. Specifically, in the Nemcok article, the jargon and vocabulary was difficult for someone who does not have a background in the topic to follow. All the information is up to date since all the articles are less than 20 years old, and the process of continents fragmenting takes quite a bit of time (more than 20 years). Between the articles (for a total of 80 pages), I think there is more than enough information. In the Tetreault article, the information is presented the best as it is accurate and clear. The other two articles could use a little less jargon, but other than that, the information is accurate and useful. The article's do not have links to other Wikipedia pages, but they reference numerous other sources.

Tone
All the articles seem neutral. They present the all the information and support them with data, facts, anecdotes, and other studies. All three focus on a various contributing factors to continental fragmentation, but they are presented in a neutral tone.

Talk Page
The talk page is fairly empty and lacks conversation. There are only three posts. One is from August 2019 and the other two are from August 2017 and April 2012.

Assignment 2
I added citation number 6. I added links for Gondwana, underwater plateaus, and inland seas. I linked continental fragment to Socotra and East Tasman Plateau. I also added a picture of a Azores Plateau, one of the listed continental fragments.