User:NAM2301/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
I am looking at the fangtooth wikipedia page

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose to look at the fangtooth page because I think it is an interesting topic. I think that it is a well developed page, containing many quality citations and obvious avoidances of original research when it comes to information not specifically known.

Evaluate the article
The lead section does well to introduce the fish and its general features. The content is well sourced and covers a rnage of important details about it, all of which is presented in a neutral tone. It is organized well with clear distinction among topics of behavior and physiology. The talk section is brief but the users do well to respectfully guide each other.