User:NB4897/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article: Social work

 * Social work: (Social work)
 * I chose to evaluate this article because of my strong interest in social advocacy and previous knowledge as a psychology major.

Lead
The lead includes a concise introductory sentence with a description of social work. The lead could include a better description of the article's major sections, specifically adding a focus on qualifications. The lead does not include information not presented later in the article.

Content
The article's content is mostly relevant to the topic and up-to-date. The content regarding social workers in literature and fictional social workers does not fit the overall informative nature of this article. The article could also include content regarding social worker's focus on helping historically underrepresented populations, given the current events of racism in 2020.

Tone and Balance
The article is neutral and not biased toward any particular position. The article does not include viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented and does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.

Sources and References
Not all information provided has a source provided. There is information from both American and Canadian sources, which may combine information that differs between the two countries. The sources are otherwise thorough, current, and come from a diverse spectrum of authors. All of the links checked have worked.

Organization
Overall, the article is well-written. There are no grammatical or spelling errors. The section organization is logical and breaks down the major points of the topic.

Images and Media
The article includes two images which support the content. The images are well-captioned. One image does not include a reference and therefore may not adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations. The images are laid out in a visually appealing wya that does not take away from the overall article.

Checking the talk page
Both formal and informal conversations are occurring about this topic in the talk page. Some people have suggested edits while others are making general comments and asking questions. This article is rated C-class, but also has B-class ratings for the WikiProject Social Work and WikiProject Medicine.

Overall impressions
The articles overall status is level 4 vital article in Society. The article's strengths include overall information covered and organization of information. The article can be improved by removing unrelated information. I would asses the article's completeness as a work in progress. It is not yet well-developed but is not underdeveloped either.