User:NCcunyevo/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Phrynus longipes

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Phrynus longipes is a species that interests me and my research, and will be directly relevant to me. When I saw that it was a C class article and covered topics I feel knowledgeable about, I felt it a good choice to evaluate as practice. My first impression was that it was relatively high content for a species level page.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article as a whole has a strong structural breakdown with neutral tone, and its elements of general social biology, behavior, and species preferences are well cited. Citations and support however are lacking for elements of conservation and human interaction, which would increase the strength of the article. Additionally the article lists outdated information about the pet trade, as in recent years the species has become quite prolific among collectors according to some sources I was able to find.

One thing that must change is that the image included in the article is of a different species entirely- in fact a different genus, the genus Paraphrynus.