User:NEMO LEGEND/Evaluate an Article

Evaluation of Nonverbal Communication. In the heading of the article the C in Communications should be capitalized.

After reading this page I can say that the bias is very little to inexistent. The information in the lead section is well cited. The topic sentence is well put and is not too long. I checked several sources throughout the article and the links still work and the publish date of the links I checked were all up to date. After checking the talk page and history page for this article I found that has been edited a lot The most recent edit was at the end of January and the user found several sentences needing a citation. The correct citation was then added and edited into the article.

I found that one of the most important points in the Nonverbal Communication article was well explained. It included the encoding and decoding process of nonverbal communications. Then goes in to depth on the differences in culture and body language. There could have been a little more research and citations in this section underneath the main lead section. I found several good articles on the impact culture has on body language but, the most interesting one can be found here. In Influence of Cultural Background on Non-verbal Communication in a Usability Testing Situation, they talk about "The experiment they conducted and how it revealed that there is a rich non-verbal component of communication in the form of gesture-clusters and body movements that happen in an interactive cross-cultural user testing situation ."

Other than not going more in depth on culture and the different roles it plays in general gestures and basic body language the article was very well written and seemed balanced in viewpoints and observations.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)