User:NIII03/Evaluate an Article

Lead Question

1.yes

2. yes

3. no

4. concise

Content


 * 1) yes
 * 2) yes last updated was January 2 2023
 * 3) no only thing that it needs is citations
 * 4) yes

Tone and Balance


 * 1) yes
 * no
 * no
 * no
 * 1) yes

source and references


 * 1) yes
 * 2) yes
 * 3) some are
 * 4) yes
 * 5) yes
 * 6) yes

organization and writing quality


 * 1) yes just missing a few citations
 * no
 * 1) yes

images and media


 * 1) yes
 * 2) yes
 * 3) yes
 * 4) yes

talk page discussions


 * 1) majority conversations that are going on are to change the way the article is worded and things that people also wanted to add on
 * 2) yes
 * 3) its kind of more difficult then it was worded in class

overall impressions


 * 1) the overall status is a 4
 * 2) there overall strengths are reliable sources
 * 3) citations that are missing should be replaced
 * 4) well-developed

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)