User:NK560/Asian Americans in California/NatasaEleftheriou Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * User:NK560
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:NK560/Asian Americans in California

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes, I would suggest adding a section to your lead that shows how you added people to the article.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes, I feel like you might be able to clarify it more
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * it gives an overall view so no i believe it is fine
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * it is not overly detailed

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes it is
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Nothing missing, keep adding people and maybe add section or 2 that talks about the people overall and grouping them

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * not that i found
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * no

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * yes, just cite them and you are good to go:)
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Just add them and you are good!
 * Are the sources current?
 * they could be updated in the resource section
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * resource #2 link doesn't work

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes and yes, just add your section
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * not that i found
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, it is pretty well organized, just add some paragraphs and pictures and I think you should be ready to go!

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * It needs more images
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * it has no images
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * there are none so yes, just be careful when adding photos that they are ok to use
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * n/a

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes it has, Just keep working and I think you have already put in a ton of work so good job!
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * You added a really notable list of people and its very long and its wonderful
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Just what you were saying with photos and maybe a section or two, photos are a really great way to update and make an article better so I would try to focus on that!