User:NMAlbaraiki/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Cell fate determination

Second Evaluation Spring 2022:

I will be evaluating Human pathogen article

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate this article because cell fate determination is a new and interesting topic to me. This concept had amazed me since the minute we discussed it in class; therefore, I wanted to learn and read more about it. Also, as the world evolves, scientists discover new information that could be used later to ensure a better lifestyle. I think studying and expanding this concept could lead to promising discoveries and inventions. Furthermore, cell fate determination divides into two or more categories, and this information is essential and must be aware of when conducting different experiments, especially the ones that aim in developing medical issues.

Second Evaluation Spring 2022:

I have chose this article to evaluate and work on due to its significance in developing and enriching the knowledge of the public, especially the people who are not very immersed in the scientific fields. This topic is very crucial in understanding the general categories of pathogens and how they invade human systems. Thus, developing this page would benefit the public who seek to understand more about the different pathogens that can affect their health.

Evaluate the article

 * First of all, the overall quality of the article is excellent and informative. However, there are several mistakes and areas to highlight and work on.
 * The lead section of the article does a great job in overviewing Developmental Biology and the different levels of the field. However, it does not define or focus on the article's main topic, which is Cell Fate Determination.
 * Also, the lead section did not provide an overview of the article's major sections or the information that will be discussed. Instead, the lead section goes on in giving a brief history of Developmental Biology and the different techniques discovered in the field.
 * Most of the information included in the lead section is not present or expanded in the body of the article because they are history-related information. It is overall loaded with information that does not explain or give an overview of the article.
 * In the section labeled Cell Fate, the author goes on in giving background information related to the general aspect of Developmental Biology. However, in the third paragraph, the author started talking about the main topic and its breakdown.
 * I think the third paragraph of the Cell Fate section supposed to be in the lead section to improve the article.
 * The content of the article is fair enough, where the author talked about the different types of cell differentiation. On the other hand, the author did not provide more information on the third type of cell fate definition without giving a reason.
 * The other two types of cell fate determination were well explained and thorough, but the "Syncytial specification" section needs to be expanded.
 * One more note about the article that lacks images and figures. We all know how visualized information can help in delivering and enforcing the material presented. Thus, adding figures, tables, or images will definitely increase the value of the article. Also, a few colors make the article less boring to some people.
 * Other than that the tone of the article was neutral and the author showed no bias towards a certain part of the article. In addition, the article was full of sources and cited very well. I would say that most of the sources, if not all, were from credential sources such as journals and peer-reviewed articles.
 * Overall, the article needs a little work on the leading section and images, as was suggested in the Talk Page, which will make great improvements to the quality of the article.

Second Evaluation Spring 2022:

This article is well written and divided, however, it lacks a lot of important and basic information that would help in completing the whole picture of each pathogen category. Points to work on for this article are:


 * The lead section do not point out the sections of the paper, and uses a vague language in describing the source of human pathogens.
 * The sections of the paper need more information on how they could harm a human body.
 * More information about the immune system role in defeating those types of pathogens could be included.
 * Instead of having a seperate, short, and broad section about how pathogens are transmitted, it can be included within each type of pathogen and make it more specific and well written to form the whole picture about the pathogen.
 * The writer talks more about the background of the pathogen and its origin than how it invades the human body and causes it to become sick.
 * Animal pathogens section needs to be more developed as it's very useful and more common in individual's life.