User:NPalgan2/sandbox2

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19205963 http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/abs/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12070899 http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/abs/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13060839,

The current lead does not mention the decline in scientific status and intellectual influence of the psychoanalytic movement, which is simply uncontestable. Furthermore the references given in the footnote on influence are quite old 1985, 1990, 1992, 2000. I propose :

The intellectual influence of psychoanalysis peaked in the middle of the 20th century. Although it remains influential in much of the humanities, the rise of biologically based psychopharmaceutical treatment and other methods such as cognitive behavioral therapy in psychology, psychiatry, and psychotherapy has seen psychoanalysis enter into decline (with the notable exceptions of Argentina and France ). Psychoanalysis continues to generate extensive and highly contested debate as to whether it outperforms placebo therapy or other treatment methods, whether it is a pseudoscience, and whether it advances or is detrimental to the feminist cause. Nonetheless, Freud's work suffused contemporary Western thought and popular culture. In the words of W. H. Auden's 1940 poetic tribute, by the time of Freud's death, he had become "a whole climate of opinion / under whom we conduct our different lives."