User:NQ/Archives/Archive 1

__NOINDEX__

__NONEWSECTIONLINK__

About my edits to "Systems of inheritance among various peoples"
Well, I merely added some information to the article. I didn't want to help any other user, I just saw that that user had added some more information before and I restored it, adding also some data on my own. I have restored the changes I made, explaining their reason. ;) Don't worry, I will explain the reason behind my edits next time. Let me become accostumed to Wikipedia. Graniole (talk) 21:40, 12 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Note  NQ    talk

Mike Aremu
Good Afternoon, I am not through editing the page, my internet service provider was about to cut me off so i quickly saved it pending when i could sort it out with my ISP and come back to edit it the page "Mike aremu". there is still so much i had to put on it. please it shouldn't be deleted. i am still working on it. Itomoike (talk) 14:37, 13 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello, I can see that the page Mike Aremu was deleted on May 30th as a result of copyright infringement. You created the page Mike aremu recently and I merely tagged it for speedy deletion as there was not enough content at the time for establishing notability. Don't worry, you can still recreate the page and contribute to it, providing the article meets WP:GNG. To avoid the issue you faced, you can also start your new article at Special:Mypage/Mike Aremu. There, you can develop the article with less risk of deletion, ask other editors to help work on it, and move it into "article space" when it is ready. I'll be happy to help you out if you need anything, Good day.   NQ    talk  20:32, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Embarrassing...
Sorry for reverting your edit! XD I misread "latest revision" and "older revision"...anyway everything's cleared up now. Eman 235 / talk 23:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Haha. No worries. I was double checking the links a couple of times to see if I messed up somehow. Meanwhile, you reverted the revert. ☺  G'day,   NQ    talk  23:43, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * O-K. Eman 235 / talk  00:04, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Reginald Menghi
for the revert at Reginald Mengi. The recent editing activity there is being discussed at WP:BLPN, here.--220  of  Borg 01:42, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Hey. Will wait and see, if there are any further attempts to recreate the article without references, a RFPP like you said, will indeed be the next course of action. G'day!  NQ    talk  16:32, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Indeed. Should the redirect be in the living people category? Someone did that. --220  of  Borg 20:11, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure. I've seen plenty of redirect pages with such categories. See here  NQ    talk  20:32, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Really, I hadnt noticed! Busy right now chasing/tagging socks of and way overdue for sleep by the way, so goodnight. --220  of  Borg 20:38, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Maria Sharapova
I just can't understand why editors are aggressively deleting the section of controversies from the page. The incident regarding sachin tendulkar is trending in the social networking sites and is being widely coverage by media in different countries. I don't think its against WP:NOTNEWS. Editors deleting the section are just stating the wikipedia's policy regarding news and not pursuing the talk. i think this is deliberate blocking of information - Rameshnta909 (talk) 16:04, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Just because it is trending does not mean it should be included in a BLP. WP:NOTDIARY clearly states "Even when an individual is notable, not all events they are involved in are. For example, news reporting about celebrities and sports figures can be very frequent and cover a lot of trivia but using all these sources would lead to over-detailed articles that look like a diary. Not every match played, goal scored or hand shaken (emphasis mine) is significant enough to be included in the biography of a person."   NQ    talk  16:15, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


 * It is trending in the social media my friend and it will be but the news reports are not an ongoing process. The incident happened and various media reported the incident. It can't be compared to events in a match she played since it is not an event that happens very frequently. Why are you insisting for a time frame to include this in the article. If sharapova said the same about David beckham then it can be included becoz she is supposed to know him? very strange reasons to block a genuine content - Rameshnta909 (talk) 17:05, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


 * See here. There is a strong consensus not to include said information, based solely on Wikipedia policies. There is nothing more to it.  NQ    talk  17:46, 4 July 2014 (UTC) - (followup)

Simple Enterprise Agile (SeA)
Hello, please remove deletion tag for the following reason: This article in no way directs anyone to any promotional material. The article provides valuable free content to the Project Management community. It is written by a very experienced Project/ Program Manager and Coach. The Author has numerous publications on Ezines.com, Amazon.com and Slideshare. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Betchplus (talk • contribs)


 * Hi, I did not nominate the article in question for deletion, I merely restored the deletion tag you removed. That being said, I can see that your article has been deleted repeatedly by multiple admins. They've explained their reasons for deletion. See here and here. Now User:Peridon has explained in detail here on how to proceed in very simple terms. I suggest that you use the Articles for Creation process. Thank you  NQ    talk  18:57, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Can you please undelete the article so it can be in the sandbox? It says that you were the deleting editor, so I am not sure where to go from here. I was not finished with it when it was deleted multiple times. I am new to this process, but it seems very difficult to finish the process if individuals delete the article before completion. The work has a lot of merit with case studies, so any help to get this back online would be appreciated. Betchplus (talk) 19:29, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Like Jakob and MadScientistX11 explained at the teahouse, it's already in the sandbox. Here is the link. You can make improvements and edit the article there as per the suggestions given to you by fellow editors. The article won't be deleted while it is in the sandbox, you don't have to worry about that.  NQ    talk  19:51, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I am really sorry, the discussion at WP:Teahouse (here) gave me the impression that you were referring to the "Scaled Agile framework" page when in fact you were asking me here about Simple Enterprise Agile. I did not delete the page like you mentioned, User:Peridon was the deleting admin and he has since answered your query here. Since he is not prepared to restore the page, you'll have to recreate the page in a sandbox (in a less promotional tone citing reliable sources) Here's the original version of the page from google cache, if it helps. Thank you. Sorry about the mix up.  NQ    talk  23:00, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Betchplus, I took a look at the draft article. I haven't been that active in Agile recently so I hadn't heard of Scaled Agile Framework but I googled it and there seems to be lots of good independent sources. The most critical thing you need to do is to add more references. My impression, granted this is just after a quick look, is that there seem to be good refs you just need to incorporate them. Also, the tone seemed to me a bit wp:promotional I suggest you read up a bit more about the policies for citing sources and how to write in an encyclopedic format. There were several good links in the responses to you in the teahouse. Alternatively, if you would like I can take a shot at it. I'm working on other non-Wiki things right now so I can't promise to turn it around immediately. If you can give me 2 days though (probably will take less time but don't want to over promise) I can edit the article and submit it as a new article myself or just pass you back my version in case you want to be the one to submit it. Either way is fine with me, if you want to just keep working on it that's totally cool. I won't do any work until you say it's OK so we don't risk over writing each other. One last thing, keep in mind that once something is published in Wikipedia no one owns it. So if your goal is to increase awareness about this that is cool but remember it can be a double edged sword. I also found some criticisms of the framework and people with those opinions are also free to add them to the article if they write in the proper manner and source their material. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 21:43, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, I am trying to get Scaled Agile Framework back online. I do realize the criticisms, which I think is what makes Wiki a great site. Everybody has a right to their opinion, and I believe that will help keep everyone honest about the Framework. I am, however, trying to get the new Article Simple Enterprise Agile up, which has been a very painful process. This is a great Free Framework that can reduce costs exponentially for Enterprise Environments. I will hopefully be able to get this article published if there aren't any more hurdles. Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Betchplus (talk • contribs) 11:59, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Hey man don't delete my article about Amit Freidman.
Much information about model Amit Freidman can be found on various areas over the internet. She has of course modeled for Ami's angels. Instead of deleting my article you may also look for agencies she also has modeled for. She has a Facebook page. Also pania rose is also not a well known model but yet she has a Wikipedia page. It would be wrong to delete her page because of this. I can even add a picture of her as well when I have permission. I have to have edited at least five articles and have an account more than four days old first. Let me keep the page up first to give me time to prove this to you. Sorry if I disturb or if you disagree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NickSarfaty150 (talk • contribs) 14:58, 29 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I didn't delete the article, an admin did. All articles on Wikipedia must adhere to the general notability guidline and Amit Freidman, fails WP:BIO. I couldn't find substantial information on the subject that establishes notability. Pania Rose on the other hand appeared in the 2006 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition and as such meets the notability requirment. You are welcome to recreate the article provided you can find reliable sources to establish notability. Thanks and have a great day!  NQ    talk  15:45, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Babasaheb B. R. Ambedkar
Hello NQ, I recently found your edit on Babasaheb Ambedkar's page. I am not touching the first line dear which is already in consensus. So please let it be like that. Akhil.bharathan (talk) 10:33, 31 July 2014 (UTC)


 * You need to get consensus on the talk page first for the additions you are proposing. There is a strong consensus against adding this laundry list.   NQ    talk  10:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

NQ, I am not touching the first line which is in consensus. I am only adding the sentence which is not against the consensus. Please reply. Akhil.bharathan (talk) 10:53, 31 July 2014 (UTC)


 * See the sections Laundry list of profession and Laundry List. You merely rearranged the words from the lead sentence into the lead paragraph. Additions like 'anthropologist' need to be discussed on talk.   NQ    talk  10:59, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

NQ I know about that list. I will refrain from editing the word Anthropologist if you think like that. Noble prize winner "Amartya Sen" called him his "father in economics". He has written several books on History such as "Riddles in Hinduism", "Buddha and Karl Marx", "The caste system and its genesis " etc. Moreover he is also the Father of Indian constitution as an untouchable. So please kindly allow me to edit. Akhil.bharathan (talk) 11:07, 31 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, I am not qualified to give an opinion on what should or should not be included in the article as I am not that familiar with the subject. See, all I am suggesting is that, since you’ve been given a warning for edit warring on this article, it is better to discuss these changes on the talk page and get a consensus first in order to avoid being blocked for edit warring. Thank you.  NQ    talk  11:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)


 *  NQ    talk

Its okay. Moreover I apologize for calling you "dear" or a "friend". Thanks. Akhil.bharathan (talk) 11:46, 31 July 2014 (UTC)


 * This issue has been discussed over and over again the past few weeks. Siddheart got blocked, and new users keep popping up, due (apparently) to off-line canvassing. Maybe it's time to treat them all as meat-puppets?  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   12:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

User: Joshua Jonathan I don't know about other users, may be its a way to communicate. Please be more concerned on the content.You always revert the changes from the first line. That's fine. I didn't argued much on that. You also removed the quote of Dalai Lama (which was sourced), the table of his writings etc. from the page. Moreover Dr.Ambedkar is the father of Indian constitution. You said "Quack Quack". What should I assume from this? Akhil.bharathan (talk) 12:34, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

I see that chose to revert again despite the warning and got blocked for edit warring. I'll definitely keep an eye on the article for such behaviour. Thanks.  NQ    talk  13:48, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

About File:Forrest (as Hachi) walking.jpg
This is regarding the message:

"A tag has been placed on File:Forrest (as Hachi) walking.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement."

I hope the message was generated automatically, because otherwise it makes ZERO sense for anyone to call it a "copyright violation" - let alone a "blatant" one at that! The image in a question is a scene from a movie. It is NOT the entire movie but just a moment from the movie. Similar (though not identical) images from this very same movie have been used in blogs and reviews all over the internet. This is just one such example - http://burstmytears.blogspot.com/2011/10/hachi-dogs-tale-2009-hachiko-dogs-story.html

The purpose of adding the image is to create a Wikipedia page for Forrest, the dog who played a role in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hachi:_A_Dog%27s_Tale   That page will eventually be hyperlinked to the name "Forrest", mentioned in the list of characters on the right of the existing page.

So please review/reconsider the decision and allow this image on Wikipedia. Thank you!

Sudhindranath (talk) 17:42, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi. The image you mentioned is a screenshot from a copyrighted film, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by the studio which produced the film. Moreover I did not see a fair use claim. I merely nominated the image for deletion, it was deleted by an admin after reviewing its merits.  NQ    talk  19:43, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Ariana Carly
In response to your question -- I wasn't certain it should be deleted immediately, so I wanted to get the views of other editors first. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 23:47, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Follow-up to your AFDs re Daniel R. Gernatt, Jr. and Dianna Gernatt Saraf
I appreciate your notifications to me regarding your AFD requests for the above identified articles. This will let you know that I have voted to keep the articles, and I commented on both of them regarding their established notability. Daniellagreen (talk) (cont)  17:29, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Please take another look at Daniel R. Gernatt, Jr. and reconsider your decision. Daniellagreen (talk) (cont)  17:39, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

List of Tamil Actors
Well You havent posted Ajith kumars name in the list, He is one of the famous Actor in tamil cinema. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.44.114 (talk) 04:09, 4 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi. You replaced a name listed under 'V' with the name "Ganja Karuppu", I did not realise that it was actually the name of an Indian actor and misidentified it as vandalism. Sorry about that. Next time, be sure to add names to the list in the correct alphabetical order instead of replacing other entries.  NQ    talk  15:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Stiki
Hi there. I noticed that you started using WP:Stiki recently and made a few edits with it. I wanted to know your opinion of the tool, including the interface as well as your experience with it. Thanks, happy editing. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:44, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Thermal Spray
Could you please advise why the section "Limitation" was reverted in this article(Thermal Spray)? thanks. A.patcharoen (talk) 00:52, 5 August 2014 (UTC)


 * 1 ✅   NQ    talk

Sorry, I'm old
What is "pinging?"Edison (talk) 23:30, 6 August 2014 (UTC)


 * <-- Uhm this?    NQ    talk  23:41, 6 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I meant I tried doing this, but that didn't seem to work.  NQ    talk  23:43, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
So strange...I just went to autopatrolled to apply for you, and you were there already! I'll start on T-Z soon. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 09:16, 13 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Well, Thanks! No one has gotten around to it yet though. That's great, do let me know if I can help you out in anyway.  I have access to the Newspaper.com archives, so just ping me if you need any more references and such. Anyway, I'll keep a tab on your pages. Also, thank you for cleaning up after me. Appreciate it.  - Regards,    NQ    talk  09:37, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

The burial location of 198 Civil War MoH-ers is currently unknown! Is there anyone more obscure than George William Tyrrell? Gareth E Kegg (talk) 01:30, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

From what little I could find :-
 * According to, he was later promoted to the rank of First Sergeant.
 * In "U.S., Civil War Soldier Records and Profiles, 1861-1865" at Ancestry.com - His enlistment date is listed as 19 June 1861 at the age of 19. That puts his birth year about 1842. - Source: "Official Roster of the Soldiers of the State of Ohio"
 * Promoted to Corporal on 5 April 1864; to Sergeant on 1 July 1864, left unit on 26 July 1865. -
 * According to the front page of the Cincinnati Enquirer, he died sometime around 12 September 1869. -

I'll look around and see if there is anything more.  NQ    talk  05:58, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Incredible. You're probably the first person to join all those dots! Gareth E Kegg (talk) 09:07, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * A quick search leads me to believe that Charles A. Taggart was the last surviving Civil War recipient; he died April 10, 1938. Do let me know if you find a later survivor. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 11:44, 14 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I just signed up for a trial at Fold3.com, perhaps there is more info on each of them. I haven't come across anyone past that yet. I'll keep searching.  NQ    talk  05:20, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Shudra
Hi NQ, I didn't understand why you reverted my edits on Shudra article. I have quoted authentic sources for my edits, one of which is a book written by Ambedkar, the man who wrote the Indian constitution. I tried to talk to Sitush who was reverting my edits but he instead of responding to me deleted what I had written there. Clearly he DOES NOT want to have a discussion. That is why I requested semi protection for that page. Please look at my edits and sources. Request you to please respect the scholarship of Bhim Rao Ambedkar and not the biases of Sitush. Hoping that you will revert your edit. Thanks. Spark121212 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spark121212 (talk • contribs) 15:57, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Here is why I reverted your edits -
 * You requested protection in the article space - Requests for protection should be made at WP:RFPP.
 * You cited "High level of IP vandalism" as the reason - An IP has not edited the article in months.
 * You are engaged in an edit war over a content dispute - Despite being warned, you've violated WP:3RR

Please discuss the proposed changes on the talk page - Talk:Shudra (I don't see any) and reach consensus rather than getting blocked for edit warring.  NQ    talk  16:15, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * They commented at User talk:Sitush. Well, actually, at the top of that page and I moved it to the bottom, as is normal practice, before replying with a ping to them. Now, back to my cremating cooking. - Sitush (talk) 16:25, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Discussed on Shudra talk page, and at User talk:Sitush. Since you have reverted pls look into the matter. The content on Shudra page right now with words like "untouchable" is extremely contentious and offensive. It is not OK to call Ambedkar "untouchable" and "dalit activist" He has been voted as the Greatest Indian. (http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/marketing/ambedkar-voted-greatest-indian-in-poll/article3771172.ece) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spark121212 (talk • contribs)

Nomination of Nenad Bach for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nenad Bach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nenad Bach until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -  Cwobeel   (talk)  00:49, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Bishop Sankey
Thank you NQ! Glad you looked into it.
 * Thanks again. You're the only one that got it right. Leftjab1234 (talk) 02:37, 25 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Happy to help.  NQ    talk  09:59, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, and how are you? -- Allen  talk  03:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Becca Tobin
You deleted the added info about the iCloud hacking, and photos of said actress that were released. The comment you made referenced the zapit article, implying it wasn't true. As it clearly is, can you put the original edit back please. 81.154.102.99 (talk) 00:48, 3 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The Zapit source you provided only says that she is mentioned somewhere in a list. See WP:V - You must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. Feel free to re-add with a relevant source.  NQ    talk  01:03, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Perhaps now somebody will pay me some attention
The article 'Suicide Methods' has had over 80,000 views in the last few days. It is an unnecessary overcategorisation and appears on google when you search 'suicide'. Whilst neutrality on a topic is important, I don't see how it is legal for wikipedia to provide such information to users of all ages. I have handed the matter over to the police. Redzimus (talk) 14:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)


 * This issue has been discussed time and again. While I do empathise with your concerns, personal attacks and threats of police action aren't going to get you very far. If you continue, no one will pay any attention to what you have to say and you will end up getting blocked for legal threats per WP:NLT.  NQ    talk  14:37, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

RfA
Hi. Thank you for participating at a recent RfA. We hope you will  continue to  support this vital  function  of Wikipedia management. However, some votes that are clearly  inappropriate will  be ignored by  the closing  bureaucrat or even indented by  established members of the community. To learn more about  the voting  process, before you  participate again, please take a moment to  read WP:RFAV. You may  also  wish  to  read WP:RFAADVICE  to  know what  is expected of candidates, and this page to know what regular  voters generally expect. If you have any  questions about  the RfA process, don't  hesitate to  ask me. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:34, 24 September 2014 (UTC)


 * clearly inappropriate?   NQ    talk  12:08, 24 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I do not understand your comment. Please be more explicit with your communications on Wikipedia. The message from  me above is a standard message for any users who  may have participated on  RfA for the first time and/or who may not fully understand the process. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad
This MBA college was started in 1962. The 3 sources (1 of which is dead) dating from and limited to 2011-12 don't make such an exceptional claim that it is consistently ranked ==> Hence ORIGINAL RESEARCH. The other edit has 2 SPS links, and 1 blog. the only RS cite TOI is irrelevant to the content. Once again an AGF revert. 190.184.144.86 (talk) 05:17, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Thank you.  NQ    talk  05:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Ping worked
I noted that you pinged me WP:RPP, and then deleted your post. Well, the ping arrived so I had to search for that edit. Maybe leaving it there would be clearer, esp. with the ec notice. (I had to spend three extra clicks! How more useful I could have spend those! ;-) ). -DePiep (talk) 09:26, 19 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Ah. The mighty ECHO. Very dependable. Crap won't work when you want it to. Sorry about that. Restored.  NQ    talk  09:44, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * My crap edits always work. -DePiep (talk) 09:47, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Newspaper article
Hi, thanks again for your help. If you get chance would you be able to provide me with the extract of Uncle Sams Pawnshop Victims from the Washington Post of 8 August 1909. Many thanks - Dumelow (talk) 20:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Happy to help! Do let me know if you need anything else. Regards,  NQ    talk  20:24, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Happy to help! Do let me know if you need anything else. Regards,  NQ    talk  20:24, 24 October 2014 (UTC)