User:NRMbirds/sandbox

Notes on the Climate Change article:

Is would be expected for this article given the cultural backdrop, this article is pretty airtight. The article is full of references, ranging from very recent to decades past, and encompassing the bast amount of backdrop that connects to the issue. It is clearly organized, with a heavy dose of evidence. That said, while the article is packed with sources, the references lead to three (admittedly exhaustive) sources. Furthermore, the article makes no mention of why so many are opposed to the notion of climate change, which I think is a major gap. Acknowledging the cultural backdrop of the issue does not diminish its objective existence; it only informs the reader better about how the issue is interpreted at a cultural scale, which I would argue is a crucial part of climate education.