User:NRobinson22/28 Days Later/Andreanicolecruz Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

NRobinson 22


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:NRobinson22/28 Days Later


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 28 Days Later

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Strengths: This was a great choice to focus on for this Wikipedia Project. I have never heard of this film before, but having read your draft I found it very intriguing. I really enjoyed the concise and neutral tone that you used while discussing the film, it wasn't analytical or opinionated. The organization was very simple and fluid in the writing style as well. There was a good amount of text, but it wasn't overwhelming to digest which I think was a great plus. Your Quick links to references being highlighted in the draft was also really great, it makes for fast access to readers to find your sources. The relevancy of the topic and the information was also very on point in supporting your choice of article.

Room for Improvement: This draft was very informational however this draft looks very similar to the original. I'm not sure if this was intentional or not. If you plan to keep this article very similar to the original, I think that's fine however maybe try to find new sources to pull further information into your draft.

Lead Section: In the Lead Section where it says "Boyle stated in the movie..." I'd suggest to add quotations even if it is a paraphrase to avoid any plagiarism conflicts.

References: I would suggest to also cite your sources in the references section, this is critical.

Images and Media: Another critique I'd like to propose is maybe add in a photo of the graphic novel, 28 Days Later: The Aftermath, that might be a useful additive to make this article even greater. I think it can also provide great insight and further detail to describe the inspiration for the film itself

Completion Status: I feel that there could still be more added to the article to steer it away from the original and help make it your own such as new sources, altering the plot summary and lead sections. Maybe you could find an article on the reception and make that incorporated into the preexisting section to add more dimension.