User:NRobinson22/28 Days Later/Frankiefoyjames Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

NRobinson22


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:NRobinson22/28 Days Later
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 28 Days Later
 * 28 Days Later

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I like the way you changed the second sentence of the lead. In the original, that sentence just gives plot points, but you give the overall conclusion there, which provides a strong framework for your edits.

It's interesting that you removed the influence paragraph. I'm not sure why exactly, but I do like the way the new version focuses more on reception as an overall theme.

I don't see any other key changes to the article so far, but I think the ones you've made are interesting, strategic, and move the page forward in positive ways.

Best,

Frankiefoyjames