User:NSB5203/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section

-Lead section provides a detailed explanation of the article

-it is concise in the way it explains the topic

Content

-The content given in the article is all relevant

-it does talk about a theory that is not proven Tone and balance

Tone and balance

-I don't believe the article is trying to persuade readers

-All the information appears to be factual

Sources and references

-This article has over 30 reference sources

-They all appear to be actual links Organization/writing quality

Organization/writing quality

-This article is broken down well into sections

-There are a few grammar errors, but all kept to a minimum

Images and media

-Some of the images don't have much to do with the topic

-They are all captioned well Talk page discussions

Talk page discussions

-This article is rated at a C

-The discussions are a to a minimum but seem to be working to better the article

Overall impressions

-I believe this article is written very well, including its structure.

-There are some details that didn't need to be included including pictures