User:N hatem2001/Chaurasi Khamba Mosque/FaridaElsefary Peer Review

General info
Nadeen Hatem
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:N hatem2001/Chaurasi Khamba Mosque
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

There is no lead but I think the article could benefit from a brief statement about the monument and the different elements of it that are discussed throughout the article.

Content

The author goes into great detail describing almost every element of the monument at hand.The content seems up to date (cannot verify as there are no sources). While they cover a lot of ground, all of it is relevant and tied together in a coherent manner. They give life to the monument as a site of cultural and historical dialogue, which places it at a competitive advantage to other articles on the topic.

Tone and Balance

The content is not biassed, and the author’s voice, although not bold or persuasive, is apparent through their critical discussion of the monument.

Sources and References

There are references made to scholars in the article, but with the absence of links or citations it is hard to determine the quality and diversity of the sources used. However, it is clear that the author has done their work as they provide extensive information about the monument.

Organization

It is well structured. The author doesn’t shy away from using subheadings abundantly to ensure that paragraphs remain concise. They also take us on a deep dive, describing the architectural style, the monument’s significance, issues related to its preservation and its role as a tourist attraction without confusing or boring the reader. Some sentences are too short and/or informal.

Images and Media

The author does not use images, so a suggestion would be to do so as a way to compliment the descriptive text.

Overall Impressions

This is an interesting article. The author takes us on a long journey which we come out of fully immersed in a newfound understanding of the monument. The author leaves nothing unsaid; from its architectural style, to its history, to its cultural and religious significance, to its contemporary role. Not only that, we can understand every part of the monument through the detailed architectural description. The author’s ability to do so without boring the reader is admirable. The only notable suggestion would be to add more hyperlinks, more pictures and revise the level of formality of the wording.