User:Naanjee44/Data Discourse/Melo1999 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Naanjee44


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Naanjee44/Data_Discourse?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

Lead
All material covered in your lead section was relevant to data discourse. I thought that it could have used a better definition of what data discourse is, opposed to what it is used for. I also think it could benefit by briefly mentioning specific topics that will be covered in the body of the article.

Content
The content was all relevant and accurate. Although I did find that the explanations were a bit too concise and difficult to understand. Elaborating and adding further explanation would help with the content section!

Tone and Balance
Your article is written in a good neutral tone, and the content is balanced and unbiased.

Sources and References
Aside from a couple unlinked citations, this area was missing.

Organization
The content is grouped in relevant categories. Could potential use some more precise categories.

Images and Media
Final draft could use some images.

New Article Criteria
Need to add better references and reference section, and also needs links to other articles. Organizational structure slightly lacks compared to other good Wiki articles.

Overall Impressions
Your article does a good job at breaking down sub categories related to data discourse.

I would suggest trying to organize your content a bit more, and also add sufficient citations along with a populated reference section.