User:Naarkorful/Asylum in France/Ozioma00 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User: Naarkoful


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Naarkorful/Asylum_in_France?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Asylum in France

Lead

 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes, the Lead now includes new additions that aids to the new content added
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes, the Lead sets the stage for the following section on Assimilation policies
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Yes

Content

 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Given the surrounding bodies of text, the information added is relevant
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * The additions speak of the assimilation polices dating from French colonialism and describing how it led to the creation of marginalized groups.

Tone and Balance

 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes the content is neutral and contains multiple sources allowing for different perspectives to be offered in the text.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No

Sources and References

 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Throughout the text relevant sources are mentioned to provide the reader with information that is backed up.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Sources added that are not within the 10 year range provide relevant content to the history of Assimilation policies.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Links do work, however one cited work Lambert 1993 was not mentioned in the references section.