User:Naarkorful/Immigration to France/Ozioma00 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User: Naarkoful


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Naarkorful/Immigration_to_France?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Immigration to France
 * Immigration to France

Lead

 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes it has been updated, new Subheading added for the additions made.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * No introductory sentence needed given that additions are added onto a section of the article that already describes the content of that section.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes, additional information added in history section of article, "Marginalized Immigrants

Content

 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes, relevant citations were added that did not date the article
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * Yes, the additions focus on the marginalization of immigrants with a specific focus on African and muslim immigrants

Tone and Balance

 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Content remained neutral throughout the text. Majority of text backed with statistics from  varying sources so multiple  perspectives are being considered.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, the content provides a broader context on immigration to France

Sources and References

 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Some sources mentioning the text is not listed in the references section of the draft. Example Rodríguez-García 2010 and Doytcheva 2021
 * Are the sources current?
 * Many of the sources mentioned fall within 10 year time period and the sources that don't, does not hinder the article from providing the most relevant information possible.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Links do work