User:Nabaan/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Climate change and gender

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Climate change and its effect on genders is a severe issue. I chose this article because I am interested in how climate change affects different genders, not focusing on individual gender identity.

The article is well written, enjoyable, and easy to read, but it lacks defining some issues. I have some suggestion:

Evaluate the article
- I think elaborating the article based on the non-binary female/ male system is crucial. Even though It mentioned in the lead section that analyzing the issue based on the binary system is incorrect, It didn't include other gender identities.

- Some of the links are missing; "other variables such as age, caste, marital status, and ethnicity" in the lead section, or " Rio Declaration on Environment and Development" in the content or last paragraph of the article.

- I was expecting to see all of the issues mentioned in the lead in content, but there weren't any details about the last paragraph (for example, how gender intersects with other factors).

- Some of the links in the references don't work, for example, references number 40 and 31.

- I think the references are not enough; articles rely on one reference that might not be enough in some points. ( for example, when it talked about case studies and when it says that women intend to donate their food during food scarcity)

-The article focuses on women and how they are more vulnerable to climate change effects; it is probably right, but since the article's topic is about "gender" and not "women," it is better to include all gender identities.

- The article's concentration is about developing countries and not how all genders worldwide may suffer from climate change.

- I think maybe combining the " Gender-blind mitigation policy" and " Gender-blind adaptation policy" is better idea.

Thanks that you care about Climate changes and how it affects people. (~).