User:NadiaCarneiro1/Wayde Compton/Renesmee21 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

NadiaCarneiro1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:NadiaCarneiro1/Wayde Compton


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Wayde Compton

Evaluate the drafted changes
The content added is extremely thorough and clearly well researched, and brings the article up to date. The significance section contributes to the original article's relevancy and the extended biographical information awards more authority to Compton as a credible author. You guys did a good job linking the page to other pages and provided decent resources for learning more about Compton's personal life, though it would be improved if you could find more academic sources. The link to Merriam-Webster may be unnecessary as that definition is not exactly disputable and dictionary definitions provide very little support and are rarely relevant. Moreover, footnotes go at the end of sentences and not in the middle, and come after the period; there are some discrepancies with punctuation placement and a variety of grammatical mistakes distract from the content. The grammar and word choice is the most problematic aspect of this article, such as the inconsistent capitalization and glaring spelling errors. The strongest section is the significance section, it is a satisfactory analysis. On the original article, the captions for the two photos need revision as well. Next steps should deal with the formatting of this piece, as the most relevant information is somewhat difficult to tease out amongst the giant blocks of text. Better organization of the information would improve the conciseness and overall quality. That being said, the way you guys have approached this compliments the original page and will fit in nicely to the pre-existing information. This is on the right track to be an excellent article and with proper editing the final product will be a strong wiki page!