User:Nadirkhan124/Sodium-motive force/MaskedSparrow Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Aerinsong


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Nadirkhan124/Sodium-motive force


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sodium-solute symporter

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

So far Aerinsong has added nothing new to the article and has not proposed any changes to the article. Though the lead article is very well written, it does not detail all of the subjects found within the article.

The content written by others appears relevant and up to date.

The content appears neutral and not persuasive.

The citations appear to back one another up though some of them are very old. It is probable that there are newer more reliable sources. The links work.

It is well written and well organized.

The images are good and appear to comply.

Content needs to be added before that can be judged.