User:Naeim9146/CONTROVERSY SECT SANDBOX

Controversy

 * Environmental Controversy
 * In 2015, A nautilus commissioned environmental and Social Benchmarking report on the Solwara-1 project was released. The report was criticized by a coalition of Canada-based environmental groups, which INCLUDE DR WHO IS CITED IN THE REPORT AND CITE THEM DIRECTLY for conflict of interest CHANGE and a lack of scientific understanding.
 * What is a "social" license - who the fuck is the "social"? - a line about that and link to social licence page if any
 * One can regard a mining project as having a social license when it is perceived to have gained the ongoing consent and widespread support of society for carrying out its operations.
 * CANT HAVE A "SOCIAL" IN THE FUCKING SEA - Explain
 * Government officials maintained that there was no community whose backing for the project can serve as proof of the existence of a social license as the proposed project was on the seabed and there would be no 'landholders' apart from the state. But due to opposition to this - such and such
 * They defined "Social" as some random social area - convenient for em.
 * As nautilus lacked a single community from which to obtain a social license, Company personnel played a key role in Offshore Mining Policy delineating an artificial community if less than 10000 people from which the company could obtain their social license from.
 * the "SOCIAL" is PNG defined.
 * Protests against solwara-1
 * CORPORATE RESPONSE WITH BOLLOCKS SCIENCE
 * M.O.N.E.Y troubles and scams
 * the "SOCIAL" is PNG defined.
 * Protests against solwara-1
 * CORPORATE RESPONSE WITH BOLLOCKS SCIENCE
 * M.O.N.E.Y troubles and scams
 * M.O.N.E.Y troubles and scams