User:Nagesaki/Evaluate an Article

When evaluating the Nikola article that was built on Wikipedia one thing that I wanted to evaluate was the content already provided. The reason I will be looking at the content provided because if this article has good information it will cover a multitude of topics yet explain them in such detail where it covers the topic in full and not neglect another topic.

When looking at the Nikola Wikipedia page we see some of the major topics that took place for Nikola that being; founding, going public, fraud allegations, then it jumps to their concept vehicles.

The articles content is up to date yet I wish they would give more in-depth detail about founding and going public portion of the Nikola they never mentioned the CEO Trevor Milton they never mentioned anything about the previous name Nikola might have went by as they were finding funding for the vehicles. When you get on the topic of fraud of allegations and fall out it the evidence is extensive on the lawsuits that impacted Nikola yet they never stated what was done before the lawsuits happened when the CEO stepped down and appointed a new CEO and on top of that never included the actual lawsuit document which is public so you can read it word for word. Also they should include the share holder information based on the lawsuit how the stock plummeted when everything hit the fan. The vehicle portion is spot on because, there is not to much information on them since they stayed concept vehicles and most of the information out there is from Nikola themselves which we do not know how accurate that information really is.

I believe this page has great content because the company is so simple and the run was short since they are on a rebranding structure ever since the allegations of being a fraudulent company. This is prime for a new look for Nikola yet you cannot forget about what they did in the past.